On 30 August 1995, Mark Sharp died in hospital in Luton, Bedfordshire.
He had been attacked three days earlier by a gang of Asians.
Mark was driving his car in Luton and was forced to brake sharply when another car driven by Abdul Shahid stopped suddenly in front of him. Mark overtook, making a rude gesture as he did so. Shortly afterwards he parked his car in High Town Road. The other car pulled up beside him and four Asians got out and confronted him.
These were Abdul Shahid, Jomir and Forid Miah and Abdul Tahid. Even though it was four to one, Tahid felt it necessary to telephone for reinforcements
Subsequently, Abdul Abbadin and Rejan Uddin and two others arrived and they came armed.
A Mr. Tatham, who owned a nearby laundrette, witnessed the attack. From inside the laundrette he saw a man hit out at Mark who then fell. He heard someone shout: "Stab him!" and added:
He saw one of the 'reinforcements' take part of a snooker cue from his sleeve and watched as he attacked Mark with it. He said:
Nevertheless, Mark hung on for three days.
Then he died.
On 11 July 1996, Rejan Uddin and Abdul Tahid were convicted of murder and sentenced to life.
At the trial, the Judge explained to the jury how they could consider PROVOCATION as a defence. This might reduce murder to manslaughter if they considered that any of the accused had been caused to lose their self-control by things that Mark had said or done which might have been 'ENOUGH TO MAKE A REASONABLE YOUNG ASIAN MALE ACT.' He added:
Forid Miah and Abdul Shahid were sentenced to four years imprisonment.
Jomir Miah was sentenced to four years detention in a Young Offenders Institution.
Abdul Abedin fled to Bangladesh. A warrant for his arrest was issued but a Bangladeshi High Commission spokesman said:
On 12 May 1998, the convictions of Abdul Shahid and Forid Miah were quashed. Luton Crown Court was then told that:
Because such a gesture towards a 'reasonable young Asian male' might just 'provoke' him. Indeed, it might just be 'enough to make a reasonable young Asian male ACT.'
Better get down on your bellies and crawl lads.
You think that makes me a 'racist?'
I don't know about that. You see, I would like to see the very British judges who treated the murderers of Mark Sharp so fondly baked in the same Aga.
He had been attacked three days earlier by a gang of Asians.
Mark was driving his car in Luton and was forced to brake sharply when another car driven by Abdul Shahid stopped suddenly in front of him. Mark overtook, making a rude gesture as he did so. Shortly afterwards he parked his car in High Town Road. The other car pulled up beside him and four Asians got out and confronted him.
These were Abdul Shahid, Jomir and Forid Miah and Abdul Tahid. Even though it was four to one, Tahid felt it necessary to telephone for reinforcements
Subsequently, Abdul Abbadin and Rejan Uddin and two others arrived and they came armed.
A Mr. Tatham, who owned a nearby laundrette, witnessed the attack. From inside the laundrette he saw a man hit out at Mark who then fell. He heard someone shout: "Stab him!" and added:
"When Mr. Sharp was in a crouching position they all converged. They were fighting to get one in. There was kicking and everything, hitting and kicking. When Sharp was lying down the group was hitting and kicking."Another witness, a Mr. Harper, described how four or five Asians were arguing with Mark:
"They were pulling things out of their sleeves and started to hit him. They looked like poles and bars. I think they all had a weapon like a chrome bar, looked like, and one looked like a wooden bar about two feet long...Ian Smith, a ten-year-old boy, was watching from the window of a flat.
They started hitting the man, pushing him to the floor and beating him. I could see all the blood. I thought about five were involved in the attack...
All of them started pushing him about, knocked him to the floor and kicked and beat him... He had no chance really. He tried to defend himself, but did not get much chance."
He saw one of the 'reinforcements' take part of a snooker cue from his sleeve and watched as he attacked Mark with it. He said:
"He didn't make him go down and the white man turned and looked around. Then another Asian kicked him. He banged off the railings of the church and fell down. Then all of them just started hitting him, stamping on him and kicking him. All the men who came down the road had sticks as well. These sticks were all the same as the first stick that I just described.The gang carried on kicking and beating him even when he was lying lifeless on the ground. At some point Mark was also stabbed in the head.
When the white man fell to the ground, the Asians with sticks hit him with their sticks. Others were stamping on him and kicking him. All of them were attacking him. No-one was trying to stop what was happening."
Nevertheless, Mark hung on for three days.
Then he died.
On 11 July 1996, Rejan Uddin and Abdul Tahid were convicted of murder and sentenced to life.
At the trial, the Judge explained to the jury how they could consider PROVOCATION as a defence. This might reduce murder to manslaughter if they considered that any of the accused had been caused to lose their self-control by things that Mark had said or done which might have been 'ENOUGH TO MAKE A REASONABLE YOUNG ASIAN MALE ACT.' He added:
"If the answer is yes then HE IS GUILTY OF MANSLAIGHTER (not murder) BY REASON OF PROVOCATION."Jomir Miah, Abdul Shahid and Forid Miah were acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter.
Forid Miah and Abdul Shahid were sentenced to four years imprisonment.
Jomir Miah was sentenced to four years detention in a Young Offenders Institution.
Abdul Abedin fled to Bangladesh. A warrant for his arrest was issued but a Bangladeshi High Commission spokesman said:
"We have no extradition treaty with Britain. It can only be done on goodwill now. It depends on how serious the British government is."On 26 April 2004, the BBC website reported thus:
"Abdul Abedin, 31, fled the UK following the death of Mark Sharp, 37, in High Town Road, Luton, Bedfordshire. Mr. Abedin is believed to have been held in Bangladesh for 43 months awaiting extradition before he returned to England and turned himself in."Yet another foreigner who would rather be banged up in Britain than at liberty in the land where his ancestors are buried.
On 12 May 1998, the convictions of Abdul Shahid and Forid Miah were quashed. Luton Crown Court was then told that:
"The murder charge had been substituted by one of wounding."So, if you put two fingers up at an Asian who almost causes a traffic accident with his dodgy driving and, subsequently, he aand his mates punch you and kick you and bludgeon you repeatedly and stab you in the head, he and his mates may expect to be charged with manslaughter instead of murder, and, thereafter, sentenced to just four years.
Because such a gesture towards a 'reasonable young Asian male' might just 'provoke' him. Indeed, it might just be 'enough to make a reasonable young Asian male ACT.'
Better get down on your bellies and crawl lads.
"Ooh, I'm having the shit kicked out of me by some reasonable Asian males. I'd better not tell you to f*** off and leave me alone, it might just provoke you to even more violence. It might just make you 'act' even worse!"Personally, I hope all the Asians who took part in the killing of Mark Sharp get stuffed in an oven at some point in the future.
You think that makes me a 'racist?'
I don't know about that. You see, I would like to see the very British judges who treated the murderers of Mark Sharp so fondly baked in the same Aga.
The Murder of Stacey Westbury
On 17 August 2007, the the body of 23-year-old Stacey Westbury was found at her home in Fulham, west London.
Christopher Braithwaite had raped, strangled and then stabbed her.
All of this happened in front of Stacey's baby son.
On 28 June 2008, the BBC reported thus:
What, like Stacey was disadvantaged, you mean? Like the British are being disadvantaged as we speak by dumbing-down, drugging-up, mass immigration, ethnic cleansing, the decimation of British industry and a criminal-good-victim-bad system imposed upon us by an insane and deeply malicious bunch of elite, leafy suburbian PC Crowders?
Like the impoverished Brit was disadvantaged in the 1920s and 1930s?Like we were disadvantaged in two world wars?Like the little girls and boys were disadvantaged when they worked down the mines, up the chimneys and in the mills and factories in the 19th century?Like the working men of Manchester were disadvantaged when they lived, on average, to the ripe old age of 26 in the 1840s?Yeah right.We’re talking the institutionally irresponsible, gold-chained, belly full, me-me-me, gimme-gimme-gimme, 'exterminate-the-white-people,' career criminal disadvantage of some within the black community, aren’t we, Oliver? You have to admit, it’s a bit different to the disadvantage we’ve suffered along the way, don’t you think?Anyone out there think the 'exterminate-the-white-people' thing is a bit over the top?
Christopher Braithwaite had raped, strangled and then stabbed her.
All of this happened in front of Stacey's baby son.
On 28 June 2008, the BBC reported thus:
"A man has been jailed for life for the sexual assault and murder of a woman, EIGHT DAYS AFTER HE WAS RELEASED ON BAIL OVER SEPARATE RAPE ALLEGATIONS."Somewhat disadvantaged"?
Miss Westbury was alone in her flat with her 10-month-old son in his cot when Braithwaite carried out his attack… Her mother Lorraine said their grandson had nightmares and became hysterical if strangers came to the house.
Prosecutor Victor Temple QC said the crime was 'a particularly grave sexually-motivated murder.'
'This defendant, addicted to crack cocaine, carried out a violent sexual assault on a defenceless young woman which in turn involved an element of sexual abuse accompanied by strangulation,' Mr Temple added.
A post-mortem examination also found she had been stabbed. He said that after the killing, Braithwaite did nothing to alert anyone to the presence of a baby on its own in the flat and that he returned after the murder to steal a telephone, some jewellery and a pedal bike…
AFTER BRAITHWAITE WAS ARRESTED OVER CLAIMS OF RAPE AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT ON 9 AUGUST HE WAS QUESTIONED AND RELEASED ON POLICE BAIL… BRAITHWAITE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CHARGED OVER ALLEGED RAPE, BUT THE CHARGES, AND OTHERS RELATING TO ANOTHER WOMAN, WERE ALL ALLOWED TO LIE ON FILE…
BRAITHWAITE HAD A PREVIOUS CONVICTION FOR WOUNDING AFTER HE STABBED A MAN IN 2005…
Oliver Blunt QC, defending, said Braithwaite was suffering from a personality disorder, worsened by his use of drugs and that he came from a ‘somewhat disadvantaged family’.”
What, like Stacey was disadvantaged, you mean? Like the British are being disadvantaged as we speak by dumbing-down, drugging-up, mass immigration, ethnic cleansing, the decimation of British industry and a criminal-good-victim-bad system imposed upon us by an insane and deeply malicious bunch of elite, leafy suburbian PC Crowders?
Like the impoverished Brit was disadvantaged in the 1920s and 1930s?Like we were disadvantaged in two world wars?Like the little girls and boys were disadvantaged when they worked down the mines, up the chimneys and in the mills and factories in the 19th century?Like the working men of Manchester were disadvantaged when they lived, on average, to the ripe old age of 26 in the 1840s?Yeah right.We’re talking the institutionally irresponsible, gold-chained, belly full, me-me-me, gimme-gimme-gimme, 'exterminate-the-white-people,' career criminal disadvantage of some within the black community, aren’t we, Oliver? You have to admit, it’s a bit different to the disadvantage we’ve suffered along the way, don’t you think?Anyone out there think the 'exterminate-the-white-people' thing is a bit over the top?
Check out what Professor Kamau Kambon has to say here.
You will note that when Kambon says what he says, the audience, such as it is, seems appreciative.
You will note that when Kambon says what he says, the audience, such as it is, seems appreciative.
The Killing the Darren Denholme
In October 1998, 10-year-old Darren Denholm suffered a heart attack and died during a in the dentist's chair at the Peffermill Dental Clinic in Edinburgh.
Dr John Evans-Appiah administered the wrong anaesthetic and Darren died as a result.
Throughout the subsequent enquiry Evans-Appiah tried to blame the dentist. He also said that earlier statements he made to police had been wrong because he was in a state of shock.
The schoolboy, attending for a routine extraction, had a natural surge of adrenaline and suffered a cardiac arrest after Evans-Appiah gave him inadequate sedation. The problem was then compounded when the doctor gave the boy an injection containing adrenaline. He then tried to get his colleagues to lie for him and invented pulse and blood pressure readings which had never in fact been taken.
Evans-Appiah admitted that he failed to ensure that a blood pressure cuff was attached to Darren either before or after the anaesthetic was administered, and that he entered false details of pulse rate and blood pressure on an anaesthetic record form after the boy was taken to hospital.
The GMC's professional conduct committee found that he didn't issue clear instructions or co-ordinate his team of surgeons and later tried to persuade the dentist, Hallgeir Pedersen, and dental nurse Kirsty Thompson to say that a blood pressure reading had been taken. He also admitted failing to ensure that an electrocardiogram was attached to Darren before or after he administered the anaesthetic.
The Ukraine-trained, Ghanaian-born doctor worked mainly as a locum and, since his arrival in Britain in 1973, had held 42 posts over 23 years. Many of these posts were related to anaesthetics, even though he had no specific qualifications in the field.
Three weeks after Darren's death, Evans-Appiah was the anaesthetist at Hazel Woolgar's caesarean section at Maidstone Hospital in Kent.
He gave the go-ahead for surgery even though she said that she could feel cold gel on her abdomen, indicating she was not properly anaesthetised.
Rebecca Poulet QC told the GMC's professional conduct committee that his failure to anaesthetise Hazel caused her to 'writhe and scream' with pain. At the enquiry, Evans-Appiah faced 18 charges of serious professional misconduct in relation to the two incidents.
During Hazel's operation, he picked up a medical instrument which had dropped on the floor, then, almost unbelievably, sucked it 'clean' and inserted it in her windpipe, declining the offer of a sterile instrument.
Hazel told the committee she warned the anaesthetist that she still had feeling in her abdomen but that he told the surgeon to proceed. She went on to describe the operation as 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' and said she suffered 45 minutes of intense pain as the baby was removed.
Following the decision in April 2000, to strike off Evans-Appiah for incompetence, Dr John Garner, the chairman of the British Medical Association's Scottish council, said:
Dr John Evans-Appiah administered the wrong anaesthetic and Darren died as a result.
Throughout the subsequent enquiry Evans-Appiah tried to blame the dentist. He also said that earlier statements he made to police had been wrong because he was in a state of shock.
The schoolboy, attending for a routine extraction, had a natural surge of adrenaline and suffered a cardiac arrest after Evans-Appiah gave him inadequate sedation. The problem was then compounded when the doctor gave the boy an injection containing adrenaline. He then tried to get his colleagues to lie for him and invented pulse and blood pressure readings which had never in fact been taken.
Evans-Appiah admitted that he failed to ensure that a blood pressure cuff was attached to Darren either before or after the anaesthetic was administered, and that he entered false details of pulse rate and blood pressure on an anaesthetic record form after the boy was taken to hospital.
The GMC's professional conduct committee found that he didn't issue clear instructions or co-ordinate his team of surgeons and later tried to persuade the dentist, Hallgeir Pedersen, and dental nurse Kirsty Thompson to say that a blood pressure reading had been taken. He also admitted failing to ensure that an electrocardiogram was attached to Darren before or after he administered the anaesthetic.
The Ukraine-trained, Ghanaian-born doctor worked mainly as a locum and, since his arrival in Britain in 1973, had held 42 posts over 23 years. Many of these posts were related to anaesthetics, even though he had no specific qualifications in the field.
Three weeks after Darren's death, Evans-Appiah was the anaesthetist at Hazel Woolgar's caesarean section at Maidstone Hospital in Kent.
He gave the go-ahead for surgery even though she said that she could feel cold gel on her abdomen, indicating she was not properly anaesthetised.
Rebecca Poulet QC told the GMC's professional conduct committee that his failure to anaesthetise Hazel caused her to 'writhe and scream' with pain. At the enquiry, Evans-Appiah faced 18 charges of serious professional misconduct in relation to the two incidents.
During Hazel's operation, he picked up a medical instrument which had dropped on the floor, then, almost unbelievably, sucked it 'clean' and inserted it in her windpipe, declining the offer of a sterile instrument.
Hazel told the committee she warned the anaesthetist that she still had feeling in her abdomen but that he told the surgeon to proceed. She went on to describe the operation as 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' and said she suffered 45 minutes of intense pain as the baby was removed.
Following the decision in April 2000, to strike off Evans-Appiah for incompetence, Dr John Garner, the chairman of the British Medical Association's Scottish council, said:
"We as doctors have a responsibility to protect patients when we have concerns about a doctor's performance. We have to address that and move to that openness culture so that if there are concerns we report them and they are investigated, so that we can avoid the tragedy that we have seen with Darren... Locums are vital for the smooth running of the NHS, but we have to ensure that where doctors are moving around that they are also checked that they are performing to a satisfactory standard."The inquiry report also criticised the decision taken by the General Medical Council in 1997 to grant Dr Evans-Appiah full registration despite a history of problems related to his competence. Doctors at Borders General Hospital raised concerns with the GMC in the early 1990s after becoming concerned about the standard of his work. He was later sacked by Falkirk Royal Infirmary in 1993 after he administered the wrong drug to a woman after a caesarean section. Experts at the fatal accident inquiry described his anaesthetic practices as 'dangerous, bizarre, inappropriate, and inept.'
Speaking after the verdict, Darren's mother said:
"I trusted Evans-Appiah to care for Darren. His life was in Evans-Appiah's hands. I will never trust a doctor again. The last two years have been living hell for me and my family."Until he was banned from practising in April 2000, Evans-Appiah was one of the 27,000 National Health Service doctors who qualified overseas.
Five years after Evans-Appiah was banned from practice, on 26 May, 2005, the BBC reported thus:
"There are now 30,863 consultants - a rise of 7,542 since 1999. Over the same period the number of GPs has also risen by 3,331 to 31,798."Thus, if there were 51,788 consultants and doctors in 1999 and in 2000, there were 27,000 doctors who had qualified overseas, this suggests that more than half the doctors working in Britain, at this time, were, probably, foreign. Now read this:
"As many as 2,000 junior doctors have failed to find hospital jobs in the latest round of NHS recruiting. The British Medical Association is blaming a shortage of training posts and increased competition from foreign doctors..."A surge in the number of doctors applying from abroad."
After spending 10 years studying to be a doctor, racking up £50,000 of debt in the process, Melissa Marlow did not expect to be struggling to find a job. The 30-year-old medic has already spent two years as a junior doctor, but in the last round of recruitment, most jobs are six-month contracts, she failed to secure a post despite applying for more than 50 posts...
Dr Marlow, who has wanted to be a doctor ever since her grandfather died of cancer when she was 11, said:
'It was always my ambition to become a doctor and it is probably still my best option to pay back the debts. We will have to see.'
She accumulated the debt while completing a degree in biology at King's College London, before doing her medical training at St George's Hospital in south London.
'It is not easy becoming a doctor and it is frustrating when you then can't get a job. I applied to so many places, but had no luck. I just hope I can get something sorted out next year.'
While it may seem unbelievable to many that Ms Marlow has struggled to get a job when hundreds of thousands of people are waiting for operations and the NHS is crying out for consultants and GPs, her case is far from unique. The BMA has been warning for months that junior doctors were facing a fight to get jobs.
There are 49,000 junior doctors employed on three grades in the NHS. Over recent years, the numbers graduating from medical school has risen to 5,300 a year - at the cost of £237,000 per graduate - and there has been a surge in the number of doctors applying from abroad, without a similar rise in posts."
Get it?
On 25 May 2005, The Daily Express reported thus:
"In one incredible case, Michael Howes, who already four AS level grade As, and is predicted to achieve another four grade As at A level, has been refused by all four universities he applied to. And five boys at Manchester Grammar School, all with predicted A grades, have been rejected from reading medicine."Michael, of St. Bede's College Manchester, said:
"Medicine was something I have dreamed of doing for years. I thought I had jumped through all the right hoops with work experience in a hospital and with a GP. There is a shortage of doctors, so you wouldn't think they'd be deterring people."THEY have been deterring the British in Britain for a very long time now Michael.
The game really is DETERRENCE. If they can deter the British from looking after themselves, if they can make the British utterly dependent on others, when the British eventually wake up and see what's been done to them, well they can whine, bitch and complain but if they ever rebel, all Big Brother has to do is pull the plug.
No doctors, no nurses, no workers, no food, no energy, no industry, no nothing.
One of Tony Blair favourite buzz-words when he was in power was 'interdependence.' "We're all interdependent now," he would crow with obvious satisfaction.
The powers-that-be in the world have been busy making us all dependent on others since way before the New World Order's favourite salesman came to power. So that none of us can ever rebel against our Lords and Masters.
That's been the name of the game for a very long time now. This IS a conspiracy. It most definitely is NOT theory. It is hard, cold, provable fact.
This is why they are in the business of deterring people like you Michael.
The Tony Blairs of this world don't want the best of the British taking care of us, they want the John Evans-Appiahs ministering to our needs. It helps to ratchet down our expectations, it helps with the process of demoralisation and subjugation.
It is war.
One Law for Them... The Murder of Frank Bexson
In May 2004, a 17-year-old Muslim girl was 'racially abused' in Coventry.
In court it was said that 64-year-old Frank Bexson swore at her and ordered her to take off her scarf. According to the girl, he also hit her once in the face and once on the shoulder before leaving.
A couple of months earlier he had been arrested, whilst drunk, for 'racially abusing' the security staff of a local supermarket and had been given a community service order. When he was sober, Frank, who was diabetic and somewhat prone to be a bit over the top when he'd had a drink, went back to the supermarket to apologise in person to those he had offended.
When he was interviewed regarding the second case, Frank denied punching the girl but he did plead guilty to a charge of racially aggravated common assault.
British law describes 'common assault,' the least serious of all criminal assault offences, as 'when a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force.' In other words, no blow has to be struck for this crime to have been committed. Strangely, this offence is considered so trivial that the police are not even allowed to arrest anyone who commits it.
However, equally strangely, it is still an offence for which the person can be prosecuted. Whilst the police cannot arrest for common assault, if there is sufficient evidence, they can arrest for actual bodily harm, and, should this charge be downgraded later, a prosecution may then be brought for common assault.
It does seem, though, that, if there is no evidence of a punch or a slap, i.e. there is no mark to show that a person has been struck, under British law a person should not even be arrested, never mind charged and prosecuted.
There was no such physical evidence in this case. The teenage Asian suffered no marking or bruising. However, because, Frank, allegedly, 'racially abused' her, the case came to court, he was found guilty of common assault and, despite being a diabetic and in poor health, the 64-year-old was sentenced to four months in jail.
On 23 September 2004, less than a fortnight after Frank was imprisoned, he was moved into a cell with a loony-tune by the name of Paul Simpson and, sure enough, after sharing Frank's company for no more than an hour, Simpson attacked the old man and beat him savagely.
When prison Staff arrived Simpson was calmly sitting on his bed, reading a book. Frank told the guards he had been attacked and asked them to remove him from the cell, saying:
Frank died in hospital 16 days later.
A little while before he was put into the same cell with Frank Bexson, Simpson had asked for a transfer to a psychiatric unit as he wished to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act. When a psychiatric nurse refused this request, he posed this question:
Putting a psycho in the same cell as an old chap with a bit of an attitude was never going to win the 'idea of the year' prize, was it?
At Simpson's trial for murder, the prosecutor, Richard Latham, described Frank as 'an unattractive character.' I wonder if Latham has ever used that particular phrase to describe Blacks, Asians or Eastern European gypsies, who gang-bang, rape, pimp, sell drugs, mug, kidnap and murder?
I know a lot of you out there are unaware of this but attitudes like the one Frank had do, most often, come from somewhere. They are not always the product of 'an unattractive character's' nasty temperament.
For example, was Frank, himself, ever the victim of racial abuse? Had he ever been beaten up by a gang of second-generation immigrants? Had he been ethnically cleansed at some point in his life? Had he lost a job or a flat because some foreigner had been given preference? Had someone he loved been raped, had someone he loved been murdered, prostituted or introduced to drugs by some non-indigenous type?
Richard Latham was bang out of order when he said what he said and he knew it. But the Freemasonic types that populate the judiciary are a special breed. Currying favour with the right crowd is part of the job.
When the Asian youth, Zahid Mubarek, was put in the same cell as the 'known racist' Robert Stewart, he ended up dead and both of their names have been in the media and parliamentary spotlight ever since.
Frank, as we all know, will rate very little journalistic attention and his name will never be mentioned in parliament. No MP will ever introduce an Early Day Motion on his behalf and no enquiry will ever be launched by the powers-that-be into his untimely and wholly preventable death.
I wonder if Frank's killer was black?
If not, I wonder if the screw who put him in the cell with the loony, was a foreigner himself and took umbrage with Frank's 'racist' CV?
I can promise you this, these are questions that we will never get an answer to this side of a civil war.
It's one law for them and...
You know the rest.
In court it was said that 64-year-old Frank Bexson swore at her and ordered her to take off her scarf. According to the girl, he also hit her once in the face and once on the shoulder before leaving.
A couple of months earlier he had been arrested, whilst drunk, for 'racially abusing' the security staff of a local supermarket and had been given a community service order. When he was sober, Frank, who was diabetic and somewhat prone to be a bit over the top when he'd had a drink, went back to the supermarket to apologise in person to those he had offended.
When he was interviewed regarding the second case, Frank denied punching the girl but he did plead guilty to a charge of racially aggravated common assault.
British law describes 'common assault,' the least serious of all criminal assault offences, as 'when a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force.' In other words, no blow has to be struck for this crime to have been committed. Strangely, this offence is considered so trivial that the police are not even allowed to arrest anyone who commits it.
However, equally strangely, it is still an offence for which the person can be prosecuted. Whilst the police cannot arrest for common assault, if there is sufficient evidence, they can arrest for actual bodily harm, and, should this charge be downgraded later, a prosecution may then be brought for common assault.
It does seem, though, that, if there is no evidence of a punch or a slap, i.e. there is no mark to show that a person has been struck, under British law a person should not even be arrested, never mind charged and prosecuted.
There was no such physical evidence in this case. The teenage Asian suffered no marking or bruising. However, because, Frank, allegedly, 'racially abused' her, the case came to court, he was found guilty of common assault and, despite being a diabetic and in poor health, the 64-year-old was sentenced to four months in jail.
On 23 September 2004, less than a fortnight after Frank was imprisoned, he was moved into a cell with a loony-tune by the name of Paul Simpson and, sure enough, after sharing Frank's company for no more than an hour, Simpson attacked the old man and beat him savagely.
When prison Staff arrived Simpson was calmly sitting on his bed, reading a book. Frank told the guards he had been attacked and asked them to remove him from the cell, saying:
"He's mad. He just kept hitting me."Simpson later said that he had only hit Frank twice and the extent of his injuries had come about because 'he bounced off the walls.'
Frank died in hospital 16 days later.
A little while before he was put into the same cell with Frank Bexson, Simpson had asked for a transfer to a psychiatric unit as he wished to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act. When a psychiatric nurse refused this request, he posed this question:
"Do I have to go out and kill someone to do so?"Let me reiterate: a known nutcase asks if his request for a transfer to a cushy number will be granted if he kills someone. A bit later, he is put in a cell with a frail, old bloke who is not capable of defending himself. Sixteen days later, we have one nut whose wish had come true and one dead 'racist.'
Putting a psycho in the same cell as an old chap with a bit of an attitude was never going to win the 'idea of the year' prize, was it?
At Simpson's trial for murder, the prosecutor, Richard Latham, described Frank as 'an unattractive character.' I wonder if Latham has ever used that particular phrase to describe Blacks, Asians or Eastern European gypsies, who gang-bang, rape, pimp, sell drugs, mug, kidnap and murder?
I know a lot of you out there are unaware of this but attitudes like the one Frank had do, most often, come from somewhere. They are not always the product of 'an unattractive character's' nasty temperament.
For example, was Frank, himself, ever the victim of racial abuse? Had he ever been beaten up by a gang of second-generation immigrants? Had he been ethnically cleansed at some point in his life? Had he lost a job or a flat because some foreigner had been given preference? Had someone he loved been raped, had someone he loved been murdered, prostituted or introduced to drugs by some non-indigenous type?
Richard Latham was bang out of order when he said what he said and he knew it. But the Freemasonic types that populate the judiciary are a special breed. Currying favour with the right crowd is part of the job.
When the Asian youth, Zahid Mubarek, was put in the same cell as the 'known racist' Robert Stewart, he ended up dead and both of their names have been in the media and parliamentary spotlight ever since.
Frank, as we all know, will rate very little journalistic attention and his name will never be mentioned in parliament. No MP will ever introduce an Early Day Motion on his behalf and no enquiry will ever be launched by the powers-that-be into his untimely and wholly preventable death.
I wonder if Frank's killer was black?
If not, I wonder if the screw who put him in the cell with the loony, was a foreigner himself and took umbrage with Frank's 'racist' CV?
I can promise you this, these are questions that we will never get an answer to this side of a civil war.
It's one law for them and...
You know the rest.
Gareth and the Bosom Clutchers
On 16 January 2003, 13-year-old Liam Richardson was killed when the stolen car in which he was a passenger crashed into a tree.
14-year-old Gareth Price was driving the car. Price pleaded guilty to death by dangerous driving and aggravated vehicle taking, and, even though his irresponsible behaviour had caused Liam's death, he did not receive a prison sentence. He was made the subject of an 18-month supervision order.
On 20 January 2005, 16-year-old Price was found hanging in his cell at Lancaster Farms Young Offenders Institution. He died later in the Royal Lancaster Infirmary.
His death was mentioned by Paul Goggins and Hazel Blears in Parliament and, on 24 January 2005, notice of a forthcoming Early Day Motion commemorating Price was also given by Hilton Dawson, MP. This EDM said in part:
Why, then, should these parliamentarians take an interest in the death of Gareth Price when they have showed so little for almost all of those who might be described as 'White British'?
In fact, of the 26 other 'child deaths' mentioned by Dawson in his EDM, only 16-year-old Joseph Scholes rated a mention in another EDM, although Gareth Myatt, the only black lad who killed himself, was mentioned many times in parliament without being named in an EDM.
In the 1930s, 40s and 50s, every shade of government was encouraging the working classes to curtail their natural inclination to breed, in order, so they were told, that they could concentrate their efforts and finances on giving fewer children a better chance of escaping the drudgery of working-class life. However, comes the fast-breeding immigrant to our shores, political correctness saw to it that everything changed, and the feckless ways of the newcomers were encouraged by an enormously generous and evolving social security system, which rewarded those who bred with irresponsible vigour.
Thus, a big tick from New Labour, the Lib Dems and the rest of the PC crowd for Gareth's dad, Sealuse, and his mother, Mary, for doing their bit in this respect. Gareth was one of twelve brothers and sisters.
Also, even though he was only 16, Gareth Price was well on the way to being a career criminal, so that would have endeared him to the bleeding-hearts in parliament. For example, apart from the central role he played in Liam's death, on 5 September 2004, he raped a 17-year-old girl twice in the Formby area of Liverpool. As his dad said:
However, there was one more thing about Gareth Price that might just have attracted the bosom-clutching attention of the MPs listed above.
He was a Gypsy.
In contrast to the parliamentary sympathy demonstrated on behalf of this 16-year-old career criminal, no sympathy at all was offered up for the girl he raped or the boy he killed.
No MP at all mentioned Liam Richardson in the House of Commons and no EDM was introduced commemorating his death.
Liam Richardson was a constituent of the MP for Sedgefield, Tony Blair.
Wake up, England.
14-year-old Gareth Price was driving the car. Price pleaded guilty to death by dangerous driving and aggravated vehicle taking, and, even though his irresponsible behaviour had caused Liam's death, he did not receive a prison sentence. He was made the subject of an 18-month supervision order.
On 20 January 2005, 16-year-old Price was found hanging in his cell at Lancaster Farms Young Offenders Institution. He died later in the Royal Lancaster Infirmary.
His death was mentioned by Paul Goggins and Hazel Blears in Parliament and, on 24 January 2005, notice of a forthcoming Early Day Motion commemorating Price was also given by Hilton Dawson, MP. This EDM said in part:
"This House deeply regrets the death of 16-year-old Gareth Price following an incident at Lancaster Farms Young Offenders Institution on 21st January; recognises with great concern that this is the 27th child death in prison since 1990."By the end of the day, 17 MPs had already signed this EDM. These MPs were: Hilton Dawson himself; Martin Caton; Alice Mahon; Lynne Jones; Simon Thomas; Martin Smyth; Gregory Campbell; Roy Beggs; Elfyn Llwyd, Peter Bottomley, Paul Holmes, Ronnie Campbell, Ann Cryer, Nigel Dodds, Jeff Ennis, Dennis Turner and Keith Vaz.
Why, then, should these parliamentarians take an interest in the death of Gareth Price when they have showed so little for almost all of those who might be described as 'White British'?
In fact, of the 26 other 'child deaths' mentioned by Dawson in his EDM, only 16-year-old Joseph Scholes rated a mention in another EDM, although Gareth Myatt, the only black lad who killed himself, was mentioned many times in parliament without being named in an EDM.
In the 1930s, 40s and 50s, every shade of government was encouraging the working classes to curtail their natural inclination to breed, in order, so they were told, that they could concentrate their efforts and finances on giving fewer children a better chance of escaping the drudgery of working-class life. However, comes the fast-breeding immigrant to our shores, political correctness saw to it that everything changed, and the feckless ways of the newcomers were encouraged by an enormously generous and evolving social security system, which rewarded those who bred with irresponsible vigour.
Thus, a big tick from New Labour, the Lib Dems and the rest of the PC crowd for Gareth's dad, Sealuse, and his mother, Mary, for doing their bit in this respect. Gareth was one of twelve brothers and sisters.
Also, even though he was only 16, Gareth Price was well on the way to being a career criminal, so that would have endeared him to the bleeding-hearts in parliament. For example, apart from the central role he played in Liam's death, on 5 September 2004, he raped a 17-year-old girl twice in the Formby area of Liverpool. As his dad said:
"He was in bother all the time. He was more or less away with himself when you were talking to him. He just kept re-offending."All of these things must have affected the PC wagtails in parliament to a considerable extent because, as can be seen from the above, they really went to town in the hand-wringing department when a poor, little lamb called Gareth, who'd gone seriously astray, topped himself.
However, there was one more thing about Gareth Price that might just have attracted the bosom-clutching attention of the MPs listed above.
He was a Gypsy.
In contrast to the parliamentary sympathy demonstrated on behalf of this 16-year-old career criminal, no sympathy at all was offered up for the girl he raped or the boy he killed.
No MP at all mentioned Liam Richardson in the House of Commons and no EDM was introduced commemorating his death.
Liam Richardson was a constituent of the MP for Sedgefield, Tony Blair.
Wake up, England.
The Subject of a Ritual Sacrifice
In September 2001, a limbless, headless torso was found floating in the Thames near Tower Bridge in London.
The torso was that of a 6-year-old African boy, christened Adam by the police, who had been smuggled in England in order to become the subject of a ritual sacrifice.
On 26 July 2004, The Evening Standard reported thus:
That's them.
Seven years for 'incitement to racial hatred.' (Telling the truth about immigrant misbehaviour)
That's us.
Good innit?
On 30 July 2003, The Mirror reported thus:
The Murder of Clare Drummond
The torso was that of a 6-year-old African boy, christened Adam by the police, who had been smuggled in England in order to become the subject of a ritual sacrifice.
On 26 July 2004, The Evening Standard reported thus:
"Child trafficker Kingsley Ojo who may have smuggled the Thames 'torso boy' into Britain, was jailed for a total of four and a half years today.Four and a half years for a torso, a decapitated head and all the other stuff.
Kingsley Ojo is thought to have smuggled hundreds of illegal immigrants into Britain and provided them with new identities.
Police believe he was part of a ring that trafficked the Thames 'torso boy' from Africa into the country. The limbless and headless body of the five-year-old - named Adam by detectives - was found floating in the Thames in September 2001.
Ojo, a 30-year-old Nigerian, used the ploy made famous in the Frederick Forsyth novel Day Of The Jackal, taking on the identity of a dead child to obtain a British passport - allowing him to travel without suspicion throughout Europe.
He entered Britain in 1999 with false papers under the name Mousa Kamara, claiming to be from Sierra Leone. He said he was seeking asylum from the country's civil war and was given permission to stay. Soon afterwards he met Barbara Bourne, 45, a woman living in Tottenham, whose son Kieran had died shortly after his birth in 1979.
Unbeknown to his girlfriend, he used the dead child to reinvent his identity again - then dumped her after obtaining a false driving licence and passport.
For more than a year he used 'business trips' between Naples and London to smuggle illegal immigrants. The authorities fear they were used as domestic slaves or sold into the sex trade.
Ojo's home in Stratford was raided last July by Scotland Yard's Operation Maxim team, which tackles immigration crime. Today he was being sentenced at Southwark Crown Court after admitting assisting illegal immigration.
He had trafficked Christopher Efe, into Britain on a stolen passport and also brought in Sylvester Ehigie. Immigration authorities say they were only the tip of the iceberg.
Customs investigators believe Ojo could have aided criminals with drug connections and benefited from earnings of prostitutes who were brought over to the UK from Nigeria. The illegal immigrants paid up to £3,000 each to reach their final destination.
When officers searched his flat, they found a video of mock-up ritual killings as well as a shot of what appeared to be a decapitated head in a basin.
Also discovered was a 'bizarre' voodoo artefact in the form of a rat's skull, pierced by a long metal spike and bound in black thread.
He showed no emotion as Judge Neil Stewart rejected defence pleas for "non-custodial leniency" and said the offences he had committed were so serious that prison was inevitable. There were, he said, a string of 'aggravating' features."
That's them.
Seven years for 'incitement to racial hatred.' (Telling the truth about immigrant misbehaviour)
That's us.
Good innit?
On 30 July 2003, The Mirror reported thus:
"Detectives investigating the Ju-Ju ritual murder of a little boy arrested 21 people yesterday.On 13 May 2005, The Evening Standard reported thus:
About 200 Scotland Yard officers raided nine houses and flats. They seized voodoo artefacts, including an animal skull with a nail driven through it and samples of African soil and rock used in making magic potions.
The officers have been involved in a two-year murder investigation since the headless and dismembered body of the boy - named Adam by police - was found in the Thames in London.
In the raids, in South and East London, they also uncovered dozens of fake British passports, identity documents and forged correspondence to be used in benefit fraud and illegal immigration. Nineteen of those held are from Nigeria, where police scientists say the murdered child, thought to be aged about five and whose identity is still not known, originally came from. Commander Andy Baker, head of Scotland Yard's homicide squad, said:
'We believe we have evidence of large scale people smuggling from Africa and that some of those we are now holding know things about the murder of Adam.'
Detectives think Adam was murdered at a house in the Lewisham area of South London by a West African voodoo priest to bring good luck to a mysterious group of worshippers. They also think his missing head and limbs may have been saved and hidden for future ceremonies.
Murder squad officers have uncovered frightening evidence of voodoo sacrifice linking West Africa and Britain, including a video thought to be an instruction manual on human sacrifice and featuring the simulated killing of a boy of about Adam's age.
It has also emerged that a box of dried human penises was found at Heathrow Airport earlier this year that had come from a flight from Nigeria.
And a Nigerian man wearing a human tongue on a chain around his neck was stopped at Heathrow by customs officers. Detectives believe it was a voodoo talisman to guarantee the man success in a fraud he was planning. They also think that some of the people arrested yesterday, including 11 women, may have been present when Adam was murdered.
They are sure the child was killed in a Nigerian Ju-Ju ritual to bring good luck to a gang involved in smuggling illegal immigrants to England.
The gang is suspected of smuggling scores of people, most of them from Nigeria, into Europe.
Many of those they have brought in are thought to have been children who have then been used in benefit frauds or sold to wealthy Africans as slaves.
Detectives believe one member of the group may also be a voodoo priest involved in as many as 20 ritual child murders in the last seven years in Britain, Africa and Europe.
Scotland Yard say the way Adam was killed and the manner in which he was cut up have all the hallmarks of a Ju-Ju, or black magic, murder. His body had been carefully drained of blood and his limbs and head surgically cut from the torso.
Experts found his stomach contained traces of a potion made from ground animal bone and Nigerian soil - another clear sign of a sacrificial murder.
The boy was wearing only a pair of orange shorts with a label showing they had been bought from a branch of Woolworths in Germany.
Last year, the police made their first important breakthrough when a Nigerian woman was arrested in Glasgow after she told social workers she wanted to sacrifice her children.
When police searched her home, two pairs of orange children's shorts, identical to those worn by Adam, were found in a drawer. She denied knowledge of the murder and was deported as an illegal immigrant.
But in March, Scotland Yard officers travelled to Benin City in Nigeria to interview her. Adam is believed to have come from the same area - as well as most of those arrested yesterday."
"Scotland Yard today revealed it has been unable to trace all but two of 300 black boys aged four to seven reported missing from school in a three-month period.
Child welfare experts say the number highlights the scale of the trade in children brought to Britain as domestic servants and covers for benefit fraud.
The figure emerged through the murder inquiry following the discovery of a child's torso in the Thames in September 2001. The identity of the victim, named "Adam" by police, is not known but his background was traced to Nigeria, it is believed he died in a ritual sacrifice.
Detectives asked each London local education authority to give them details of black boys aged four to seven reported missing from school between July and September 2001. It emerged 300 had vanished, 299 from Africa and one from the Caribbean. Police only managed to trace two children.
The true figure for missing boys and girls is feared to be several thousand a year. Detective Chief Inspector Will O'Reilly, leading the hunt for Adam's killers, said:
'It is a large figure, far more than we anticipated. 300 young boys didn't return to school and are really lost in the system.'
Police visited the children's addresses, but in most cases were told the boys had returned to Africa. Inquiries undertaken via Interpol in the boys' home countries failed to trace them. Journalist Yinka Sunmonu, an expert in the issue, told the BBC's Today programme:
'Children are being trafficked. There is domestic slavery, physical abuse, sexual abuse. Children are ... here one day and gone the next.'
The Met's recent Paladin child investigation found hundreds of unaccompanied children arrive in Britain each month."
On 20 August 2001, 20-year-old Clare Drummond was murdered in Plumstead, South London.
Clare, a horticultural student, worked with Rafael Lopez a former boyfriend, at the Fleet Cars mini-cab office in Edmonton, at the weekends. Lopez and Clare had spent the day in Kent and had then gone back to his flat.
During the evening, they got into an argument, as a result of which 45-year-old Lopez strangled her, tied her hands and feet together, wrapped her body in a bed sheet and stuffed it under the bed.
At his trial, the court heard that a row broke out over Clare's relationship with a gentleman by the name of Rabih Malaki. Prosecutor, Peter Kyte QC, said:
For two weeks, he did his best to ignore her body and was in the process of making arrangements to visit his mother in Spain when he was arrested.
In court Lopez denied murder. He said he had been depressed, as his mother was ill. He told the police:
Here's another: a Spanish tw*t old enough to be her dad and a media-spun preference for everything alien.
Wake up, you Clares.
Clare is pictured below.
Rogues' Gallery cont. Clare, a horticultural student, worked with Rafael Lopez a former boyfriend, at the Fleet Cars mini-cab office in Edmonton, at the weekends. Lopez and Clare had spent the day in Kent and had then gone back to his flat.
During the evening, they got into an argument, as a result of which 45-year-old Lopez strangled her, tied her hands and feet together, wrapped her body in a bed sheet and stuffed it under the bed.
At his trial, the court heard that a row broke out over Clare's relationship with a gentleman by the name of Rabih Malaki. Prosecutor, Peter Kyte QC, said:
"A neighbour heard a high-pitched woman's scream coming from upstairs. It went on and on, it was interspersed with loud thumping noises. At the end of the loudest thump of the lot, the whole floor shook and the screaming instantaneously stopped."The following day Lopez collected Miss Drummond's wages.
For two weeks, he did his best to ignore her body and was in the process of making arrangements to visit his mother in Spain when he was arrested.
In court Lopez denied murder. He said he had been depressed, as his mother was ill. He told the police:
"I have been under a lot of pressure... All of a sudden, I just went mad and I just strangled her."Now that's what I call an entirely reasonable explanation.
Here's another: a Spanish tw*t old enough to be her dad and a media-spun preference for everything alien.
Wake up, you Clares.
Clare is pictured below.
No comments:
Post a Comment